Amazon Block Storage is huge
Thursday, August 21st, 2008
This morning my spam filter caught this message from Amazon announcing the new Amazon Block Storage service. I’m looking forward to seeing this work it’s way into implementations from hosting companies that are currently re-selling a service layer on top of the already interesting EC2.
One of the largest drawbacks with EC2 (and a major reason I’ve stayed away from it with a 10′ pole) has been the lack of persistent storage. If your just purchasing occasional horsepower - say for a large compute project - you would have to configure your instance - import your data - do your calculations etc and then bring all your data back down. How many times have you needed to wait until the middle of the night to run complex queries or analysis on your data and didn’t want to take down your database to do it? It’s been more than I can count for me. Now you can run the server only when you need it. I can see this a serious boon for folks wanting to do data analysis but don’t need the large EC2 container running over weekends and holidays but don’t want to pay for transfer costs to and from local sources (or deal with pushing data in and out of S3).
From the email:
Prior to Amazon EBS, block storage within an Amazon EC2 instance was tied to the instance itself so that when the instance was terminated, the data within the instance was lost. Now with Amazon EBS, users can chose to allocate storage volumes that persist reliably and independently from Amazon EC2 instances. Amazon EBS volumes can be created in any size between 1 GB and 1 TB, and multiple volumes can be attached to a single instance. Additionally, for even more durable backups and an easy way to create new volumes, Amazon EBS provides the ability to create point-in-time, consistent snapshots of volumes that are then stored to Amazon S3.
Amazon EBS is well suited for databases, as well as many other applications that require running a file system or access to raw block-level storage. As Amazon EC2 instances are started and stopped, the information saved in your database or application is preserved in much the same way it is with traditional physical servers. Amazon EBS can be accessed through the latest Amazon EC2 APIs, and is now available in public beta.
Right now I think I’d rather have a
For the last couple of weeks I’ve been developing and working completely remotely. Removed from my office, removed from my resources and often while in remote locations from the car with my family as we travel from destination to destination. It’s been enjoyable to be part of everything the family is doing but it has not been without difficulty. For example, it can be hard to debug complex problems with kids unhappy in the back seat or to read a terminal session with the sun washing out the screen. It can also be challenging to be working via SSH and have the connection drop because we travel through an area without data connectivity.
I’m an Apple fan boy. I switched with at dawn of OS X and haven’t looked back. I love the
Despite my
For folks using a Mac, you’ll need to download the
I was unsatisfied with the SIM card insertion - there’s nothing but friction holding it in. I have a feeling over time it will fall out. The other connection that felt weak is the actual slot in the Mac. I’m not sure if this is a issue with the card or the laptop’s ExpressCard/34 slot. The old style PC Cards seemed to have a more solid connection and the handy eject button that popped out let you know if it was in all the way or not. 

My last test was to upload a few photos (in fact the ones I took for this post) just to see how that all performed. My expectations were pretty low given the issues with the download test. I was able to upload all of these photos (~204Kb) in about 10 seconds which I actually found reasonable. The larger screenshot above (~188Kb) uploaded in about 4 seconds which was even faster. My conclusion is that this certainly won’t be replacing my broadband cable modem for daily internet access (not to mention there’s a data cap on the service) but it’s a viable alternative to going without and for those who travel sufficiently, it’s a cheaper alternative to pay as you go WiFi in airports and hotels.
Panoramio beat Microsoft to the punch. Techcrunch has an